Victorian Prostitution

Flora Tristan argues that many prostitutes were forced into the business because of hunger and lack of wealth; at the end of the day these women needed to do whatever they could to put food on the table and keep themselves from starving.  Tristian even goes to the London streets one evening to observe the prostitutes.  Most of Tristan’s argument implies that men perpetuate the role of the prostitute in this society, because women are treated lower than men, and thus roles like this exist for them.  Tristan also says that “three or four years is the life period of half of the London prostitutes” because they’re made to drink alcohol and live a life deprived of nourishment, proper medicine and medical care, and the normal cares that life would provide for them.  Towards the end of her argument, Tristan says that men are ideally the cause of prostitution, as they destroy family affections, and allow love to take no part in their lives.

Magdalen by Amy Levy supports the arguments that Flora Tristan makes in her article; Levy does not put blame on the prostitute herself, but rather on the man (and society as a whole) that have put her into the position she is in.  The speaker in the poem is speaking to a man, one that has gotten her ill, and reveals at the end of the poem “the doctor says that I shall die. / It may be so, yet what care I? / Endless reposing from the strife, / Death do I trust no more than life” (Levy).  It is here the audience sees the speaker trusts death no more than life; life being one that has let her down and led her to prostitution, a life that has allowed her to become ill with no medical treatment or care to recover.  The viewpoint of the poem as well as the events that unfold and where the blame is placed all point towards Amy Levy agreeing with Flora Tristan—that society is to blame for the position these women are in.

 

Victorian Prostitution

Tristan, although expressing sympathy for the prostitutes, still feels disturbed by the lives and actions of the prostitutes of the time. She writes, “To brave death is nothing; but what a death faces a prostitute! She is betrothed to sorrow, committed to abjection!- Physical tortures incessantly repeated, moral death all the time, and scorn for herself!” (Tristan)

Prostitutes are perpetually placed in a state of despair, knowing that they are acting against God, committing sin, and shunned by mankind.

Despite this, Tristan heavily blames society for a prostitutes’ place in the world. Their place was created by a division of class as well as a separation of gender. These women were offered no eduction, and even those who were educated had very limited job options. Due to this, Tristan believes that prostitutes could not be deemed immoral for actions that were out of their control.


 

Thomas Hood, in his poem “Bride of Sighs” expresses this same sympathy for prostitutes. This view is similar to that of Tristan, but rather than blaming society and class differences, Thomas Hood associates the issue of prostitution with a lacking of family and close loved ones.

He blames the men for mistreating the prostitutes, rather than treating them as women, as humans. He writes, in lines 15-20,

Touch her not scornfully;

Think of her mournfully,

Gently and humanly;

Not of the stains of her,

All that remains of her

Now is pure womanly.

Thomas Hood feels great sympathy towards the prostitute, the subject of his poem, who ultimately kills herself by drowning. He wishes for the men who find her to treat her dead corpse with the same gentleness that he speaks of earlier in the poem.


Both Thomas Hood and Flora Tristan note that prostitutes are part of the lower class, and that prostitutes are without a home.. Thomas Hood, however, blames this lacking of a home (lacking of a family) for the desolate & lonely life of a prostitute, where Tristan blames class differences.

Victorian Prostitution

An interesting aspect of Flora Tristan’s discussion about Victoria prostitution was her own involvement in the story that she wrote. Instead of simply speaking with prostitutes, she goes a step further and explores late-night, underground London, entrenching herself within an environment that becomes openly hostile towards her. I found it depressing that she had to be accompanied by two men “armed with canes” in order to feel remotely safe, and even then the trio was still berated. It must have taken an impressive amount of courage to willingly submit herself to the things that she saw in the “finishes”, and her account is all the more powerful because of it. Instead of hearing stories told from others, we get a first-hand tale of wild masochism and debauchery fueled by an economic rift between classes. The oppressive male gaze is dominant throughout the entire article, and I think that this relates towards Thomas Hood’s “The Bridge of Sighs”, in which his gaze is so prominently focused on.

Hood’s poem however has a different overall tone to it. The men in Tristan’s critique all exert their power over women, while Hood uses his gaze as a way of imagining what the object, a young dead woman, of his poem’s life was like before her death. While he focuses specifically on her body, he also imagines her family life in a way that seeks to humanize rather than sexualize her. Like Tristan, he laments the fate of the prostitute and considers the situation that has caused her to kill herself. Instead of blaming prostitutes, Tristan and Hood blame the society that has effectively forced these women into their profession without choice. Both the article and the poem critique the societal double standard as they relate to men and women (specifically lower-class women) and try to humanize those whose actions have been impressed on them by a ruling, male majority.

Victorian Prostitutes

Flora Tristan blames Victorian London’s rampant prostitution on a number of factors, including an unequal distribution of wealth and society’s oppression of women. She discusses the prejudices which prevent women from achieving a high social status, such as their lack of professional education and their inability to own land. According to Tristan, if women were allowed the same education and to hold the same occupational positions as men, they would not be subject to the poverty and degradation that ultimately leads them to prostitution. She also states that women, since they are not treated as autonomous individuals, cannot be held accountable to any sort of “moral law”— in fact, they’re taught their whole life the “art of pleasing”, so how could they not, in desperation, turn to prostitution just to get by (Tristan)?

Tristan goes on to give a lengthy description of Waterloo Road, a dangerous area of London where prostitutes and pimps lurk while awaiting clients, and one of the “finishes”, a sort of cabaret/tavern where wealthy men engage in orgies with prostitutes. Tristan explains that these finishes are the “meeting places for high society where the elite of aristocracy assembles”, where these men can indulge in food, drink, and sex, committing all sorts of debauchery she describes as “ revolting and frightening”.

Tristan notes that most prostitutes succumb to disease within three or four years, if not in hospitals, where they are given last priority, then on the streets. In his poem, “The Bridge of Sighs”, Thomas Hood laments the loss of a young prostitute. While he calls upon the reader to mourn for the woman, “loving, not loathing” (14), and treat her body with tender care, he does not offer any sort of critique of society to mirror Tristan’s. Instead, he writes:

Make no deep scrutiny

Into her mutiny

Rash and undutiful:

Past all dishonor,

Death has left on her

Only the beautiful (21-26).

While Hood does ask the reader to forgive her for her crimes, he speaks of the prostitute as a rebel to society, a disgraceful and sinful person. Hood would probably argue Tristan’s point that women are not subject to a “moral law”, and in fact describes prostitution as “evil behavior” (104). He places the blame on the prostitute, not society. Yet the poem is not angry or damning; instead, it emits a sense of sympathy, or at least pity, for the prostitute’s plight. The prostitute is not a victim to society, but she is still a victim who has suffered at the hands of her own actions.

Prostitution and Blame in Victorian London

Flora Tristan views prostitution in England during the Victorian Period as something like a disease, a “diabolical debauchery” that women were forced into by economic necessity, hunger, and inequality between the genders.

Tristan uses forceful language to express her disgust at the way prostitutes conduct their daily business and are forced to live their lives, as well as the lack of “commiseration for victims of vice” through the church or society. She also blames England’s greed (primarily the growing market economy/ public sphere) and corruption alongside rigid gender expectations. With growing poverty came a need for women to provide for themselves in any way they could. The “love of money” breaking down the young man’s wants for domestic affection or compassion further aggravated treating the women like animals. Overall, Tristan does not blame the women for their profession, saying that they are “driven to” it, placing her ire toward English society.

Continue reading

Victims of Society

Tristan sees prostitutes as victims of the patriarchal society of Victorian London. She says, “…if chastity had not been imposed on the woman for the sake of virtue without the man’s being subjected to the same thing, she would not be pushed from society from yielding to the sentiments of her heart…” (Tristan, 2). Tristan describes how the unfair balance of virtue and sexuality affects women: they would be seduced by men, usually wealthy men, and end up giving up their virginity. The men would then turn on them, having played their game, and move onto the next girl. With women’s sexuality being so closely tied to their identity, they would be disgraced and turned out by the strongly opinionated society. As a result, they have no choice but to turn to prostitution as a source of income. The poem Magdalen supports this idea. It tells the story of a girl who is seduced by a man, she falls in love, and then she is left cold. Without anywhere else to turn, she becomes a prostitute and finds out that she is going to die from some disease. This supports Tristan’s statements. The poem blames society as a whole rather than men or women. The speaker says, “…And there is nothing false nor true; // But in a hideous masquerade // All things dance on, the ages through. // And good is evil, evil good; // Nothing is known or understood // Save only pain” (Levy, 800). The lines speak about the “masquerade” which is the false faces that people wear. They follow the flow of society because that is the system that has been set in place by those in power. Even if it is not “known or understood” it is the lifestyle that the population has become accustomed to. The poem definitely takes a sympathetic tone for the prostitutes who are victims of their society. It is also not quick to cast judgment on those who wrong them either. It offers a more objective look on the affairs that go on.

Victorian Prostitution

Tristan describes prostitution in the Victorian period as being an issue created by men.  She believes that because women and men are not treated equally, particularly in regards to sexuality, prostitution has become a lifestyle for fallen women.  She is quiet sympathetic to prostitutes and states, “When a dog dies he is watched over by his master, whereas the prostitute ends on a street corner without anyone’s throwing her a glance of pity!”  (Tristan 5).  This illustrates that a dogs life is more valued by society than a prostitutes.  I think the Thomas Hood poem agrees with Tristan’s article, because he too seems sympathetic towards prostitutes.  In his poem, he talks about a dying prostitute and states, “Take her up tenderly / Lift her with care” (Hood 1).  The poem still uses words like sin and mutiny to describe her profession, but uses caring language about how she should be treated in her death.  I think in a way Hood is blaming the women, but also takes the woman’s life history into account.  Tristan’s article blames society and does not blame women at all for becoming prostitutes, but Hood’s poem is harder to determine.  Hood seems to blame homelessness for prostitution because he references a woman not having a home a few times.  He also describes a homeless woman as being cold which I think is his way of giving her reasoning to become a prostitute.  Tristan brings money into the equation the same way that Hood does.  If a woman is homeless than how else is she supposed to live?  I do think that Hood partially blames the woman because of the way he discusses prostitution, but he also seems to be stating the only God can judge her sins, not men.  The last stanza of the poem seems to support this.

Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre and the Victorian Position of Governess

The position of governess in Victorian society is an awkward one. The author of “Hints on the Modern Governess System” views the governess system as problematic for both governesses and the families they serve. The author writes:

Whether it be right or wrong, as a general rule, for mothers to delegate their most sacred trust to hired strangers, we are not here to discuss. The fact exists. Is the system carried out fairly for all parties? Is there any question astir as to its abuse? Philanthropic eyes are scanning many social evils. (570)

The author is particularly concerned with the plight of the governess. They are concerned that governesses are not paid enough, that they are not viewed as an equal to the mother of the children they govern, that they must deal with rambunctious and insolent children, and that they are going insane and living in asylums–a fact that is misleading, since, as the editor notes, many governesses without families and between positions would stay in asylums because it was a cheap and somewhat respectable place to stay (“Hints on the Modern Governess System” 571).

However good the author’s intentions may be, they come off as slightly patronizing when this article is juxtaposed with the text of Jane Eyre.  While the author believes that being a governess is mentally exhausting for a governess must deal with child intellect all day:

Hour after hour she has bent down her mind, and raised the children’s to given points, which, however interesting, are exhausting. A young thing, perhaps, still herself, ready to spring up again at one kindly touch. Do not even fond mothers, who teach their own children, feel that after the labors of the day they need some interchange of mind? (573)

this opinion is never expressed in Jane Eyre by Jane or any other character. On the contrary, Jane is very fond of teaching and caring for Adele. After Mr. Rochester speaks of Adele’s unfortunate and disgraceful family situation, Jane defends the orphan, “I have a regard for her, and now that I know she is, in a sense, parentless — forsaken by her mother and disowned by you, sir, — I shall cling closer to her than before” (Brontë 218).  Jane’s affection for Adele isn’t based solely on the orphan connection. Jane is fond of Adele’s character: “Still she [Adele] had her merits; and I was disposed to appreciate all that was good in her to the utmost” (218).

The author of “Hints on the Modern Governess System” takes issue with the lower class distinction that a governess holds. The author believes that there is no “greater anomaly than that which makes a woman responsible for children, and their exemplar in all things, whose mother treats her as if she were unfit to associate herself and her guests” (571). Brontë portrays this negative and classist view of governesses in Victorian society in the scenes where Mr. Rochester’s guests mock Jane right in front of her face. In one instance, Blanche Ingram says:

You should hear mama on the chapter of governesses: Mary and I have had, I should think, a dozen at least in our day; half of them detestable and the rest ridiculous, and all incubi – were they not mama? (254)

However, Brontë is making the case for governesses as being equals to their employers, as Mr. Rochester insists that Jane continue to be present when his guests are over (259). In this regard, the author of “Hints on the Modern Governess System” and the author of Jane Eyre are in agreement.


Works Cited

Brontë, Charlotte. Jane Eyre. Ed. Richard Nemesvari. Toronto: Broadview Press. 1999. Print

“Hints on the Modern Governess System.” Fraser’s Magazine. 1844. Jane Eyre. Ed. Richard Nemesvari. Toronto: Broadview Press. 1999. 567-577. Print.

Governesses

The author of the piece in the appendix is clearly against women becoming governesses.  The author believes that it is detrimental for a woman to become a governess because “the miseries of the governess may even swell that sickening glamour about the ‘rights of women,’ in which would never have been raised had women been true to themselves” (570). The author believes that women should not be educated and also makes claims that becoming a governess will make women go insane.  The author also seems concerned with how the role of a governess has upset the class system.  The author states that women who used to work in shops have now become governess and when they decide they don’t want to be governesses, women of lower class have taken their spots at the shops (569).  I think the author is upset that women have found a way to raise themselves up in class without the help of a man.  Bronte clearly does not agree with this portrayal of the governesses.  The author clearly thinks that becoming a governess leads to insanity, but in the novel Jane becomes a governess because, “I remembered that the real world was wide, and that a varied field of hopes and fears, of sensations and excitements, awaited those who had the courage to go forth into its expanse, to seek real knowledge of life amidst its perils” (151).  The author also seems to think women almost brag about their intelligence once they acquire it, but in the novel Jane is quite modest about her abilities.  Mr. Rochester is also fascinated by Jane and speaks with her as if she is his equal.  I think in this sense Bronte is trying to eliminate class differences.  Jane also does not upset the class system thus far in the novel because she was a teacher at Lowood and then becomes a governess which isn’t much of a raise in class.

Women and Liberty

“Hints on the Modern Governess System” describes the role as a governess as an opportunity for lower class woman, but an opportunity for loneliness. The beginning suggests that the role of a governess would suit women because women were born for a quest for knowledge. The author refers to Genesis and the fall as women’s first documented quest for knowledge. It from this quest that men have punished women for suppressing women’s natural thirst, but this issue is slowly turning when more women remain single rather than get married (568). The increase in single women ignited the governess system because “Women must have bread as well as men…They found, if they would not sink in the scale, they must work with their heads, and not with their hands” (569). The role of the governess simultaneously for a task that allowed single, poor women to leave the home, while keeping wealthier women in the home to learn and eventually become wives. The idea of middle class women being able to learn from home was admired by the author. The author seemed to appreciate the governess role for that regard, but deemed the governess as a lonely job.

Charlotte Bronte seems to be playing with this scenario at extremely exaggerated levels to stress the importance for women to leave the home in Jane Eyre. Jane is happy to be able to. She becomes the governess to Adele in the Thornfield estate. Jane feels like she has a purpose and thus does not feel lonely nor misses ‘a home’ which she reveals to Mr. Rochester when he catches her walking the grounds at night and he says to her: “I should think you ought to be at home yourself” (183). Jane likes being away from home which is contrasted to the screams she hears from the attic. As the novel goes on, and the Mrs. Rochester is still missing, the screams suggest the wife’s desperation to escape the home. This idea opposes the argument in Fraser’s Magazine. Women like to be away from home and if they are not able to, they will feel trapped and are held as prisoner. Society wants women to remain in the home, but women do not feel the same.

 

Works Cited

Brontë, Charlotte. Jane Eyre. Ed. Richard Nemesvari. Toronto: Broadview, 1999. Print.

“Hints on the Modern Governess System.” Fraser’s Magazine November 1844: 567-577. Print