Governess of Jane Eyre

“Hints on the Modern Governess System”, an article published in Fraser’s Magazine in 1844, discusses the lifestyles of governesses of the time. The article describes education as the “work of life” which sustains “intellectual and moral growth” (568). The position of governess was a cost-effective alternative to formal education for many Victorian families; rather than send their children away to school, parents could instead hire a governess to come into their home and conduct lessons. It was a position known to women alone; education was the “holy vocation of a woman”, a trade in and of itself (568). Yet the article laments the difficulties of the life a governess. Although the job was a way for women, even those of lower classes, to emerge from the traditional domestic life and make a place for themselves in the workforce, it was no easy task. The pay was poor, and the children difficult; many young governesses were ill prepared for the “childish follies and perversities which need a mother’s instinctive love to make them tolerable” (571). Furthermore, a governess was expected to keep her reservations about the children she taught to herself. To vent her frustrations would be to betray the trust of the family she works for, as a governess was the “confidante of many family secrets” (572). Despite her involvement in family affairs, the governess was otherwise ostracized by the family from anything that wasn’t school-related, resulting in feelings of isolation and loneliness on her behalf.

Jane, the protagonist of Jane Eyre, takes up the role of governess for reasons not unlike those suggested in the Fraser’s Magazine article. After six years as a student of Lowood and two as a teacher, Jane yearns for “liberty” of the place she has spent the entirety of her adolescence (151). She becomes the governess at the Thornfield estate for a young girl named Adele. Although she takes a liking to Adele, Jane does indeed experience the loneliness known to governesses, which she calls a dreaded “stagnation” (185).

Yet Thornfield is a strange place; Mr. Rochester, Adele’s guardian, makes no claim to be her actual father, yet she lives with him at Thornfield because her own mother, Mr. Rochester’s ex-lover, abandoned her. Jane often hears a crazed laugh coming from the grounds of the estate, which are attributed to the seamstress, Grace. Jane later saves Mr. Rochester’s life from a fire in the middle of the night, which he is grateful for, and asks her not to speak of the incident to anyone. He tells Jane he knew she would “do [him] good in some way” the day he met her (244).Jane, though she takes up what is considered a lowly position in Victorian society, serves an important role at the Thornfield estate as something of a parental figure for Adele and an object of fascination for Mr. Rochester Continue reading

Bronte and the Victorians opinion of Governesses

The Victorian’s beliefs about the governesses were harsh and unapproving. This connects with their standards for women and how far they should rise, academically and socially. Bronte argues against this belief by presenting us with Jane Eyre. As a governess, Eyre is more than qualified intellectually and cares deeply about her student.

The article in the appendix shows how Victorians saw the majority of governesses as wasting their time. They were wasting the child’s, the parent’s and their own time through this form of “second-rate school.” They were poorly swimming upstream as the article states that “she is hourly tried by those childish follies and preservatives which need a mother’s instinctive love to make them tolerable” (571). Why let this strange women into your house to teach your kids when they can gain no control over them. The prejudices of women is also prevalent in their beliefs on governesses, claiming that the governesses and their students should “Becomed fitted to be good wives and good mothers” (577) And if they do not marry, they should be working to know how to run a household. These are the standards that women were supposed to be meeting, not rising in intellect to the point that they can teach the new generation.

Eyre breaks both of these beliefs as she serves as a great and caring parental figure to Adele as well as improving her intellect and sharpening her skills. Adele is being raised by a man who may or may not be her biological father who is never at the same place as her. We have not yet seen a large amount of moments between Jane and Adele, but there are moments when the reader can see how Jane cares for Adele, for instance when Jane says this to Mr. Rochester “I have a regard for her, and now that I know she is parentless—I shall cling closer to her than before” (Bronte 218). The governesses is on the way to becoming the greatest parental force that Adele has ever had. She is also enhancing Adele’s intellect, as Mr. Rochester states “She is not bright, she has no talents, yet in a short time she has made much improvement” (191). Even when he is critiquing his new resident of his house, Mr. Richmond still can not hide the fact that Jane has been an efficient teacher.

Brontë, Charlotte. Jane Eyre. Ed. Richard Nemesvari. Toronto: Broadview, 1999. Print.

“Hints on the Modern Governess System.” Fraser’s Magazine November 1844: 567-577. Print

Jane Eyre and Fraser’s Sympathy for Governesses

This article, “Hints on the Modern Governess System” from Fraser’s Magazine presents the conflict of isolation in the role of the governess. While it does not outright combat the morality of whether a mother should teach lessons to her own children (as opposed to trusting them in the hands of a “stranger”), there are instances in the article that certainly seem to object to the idea of governesses, not because of any inadequacies, but because of the conditions of which they work under. The author writes, “Day by day the governess is worn by the disappointments the most promising child must inflict upon its teacher; but to whom can she, in her weariness, turn for sympathy?” (573) The writer indicates that the parents of the children do not want to hear of their child’s shortcomings, especially by a “third person,” so it leaves the governess in a complicated position. The indication of the governess as a “third person” also establishes her sense of inferiority to the rest of the household. This is just one aspect of the governess’s loneliness. She is also condemned to mere isolation when she is not with the children, “It is only the governess, and a certain class of private tutors, who must hear the echoes from the drawing-room and the offices, feeling that, in a house full of people, they dwell alone” (574).
Perhaps this idea of loneliness of the governess expands further than just her job at an estate. In Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre, when Jane becomes a governess at the Thornfield estate, she is initially insulted and demeaned by Mr. Rochester (“No wonder you have rather the look of another world” (192)), even though Jane nonetheless, returns his insults with clever wit, this still confirms Jane as an inferior, given her position in the household. However, Jane has a more clever insight: “It is in vain to say that human beings ought to be satisfied with tranquility…Women are supposed to be very calm generally: but women feel just as men feel: they need exercise for their faculties, and a field for their efforts just as much as their brothers do” (178). I feel that this quote responds to the condition of women in general of course, but in terms of governesses specifically, it connects with the claims made in Fraser’s article, as these women who are deemed “odd” by Victorian society are subject to even greater loneliness even more when they support themselves.

Works Cited

Bronte, Charlotte. Jane Eyre Ed. Richard Nemevari.Peterborough, Ont: Broadview, 1999. Print.

“Hints on the Modern Governess System.” Fraser’s Magazine. November 1844: 567-577 Print.

Stigma

I decided to focus my attention on a very specific category, abortion. This category falls under ‘Sex’ as a preliminary category. The ‘Abortion’ category is broken up into two subcategories: cases & opinions.

Now, I most certainly realize the stigma that goes along with abortion, and after going through these readings, it has become abundantly clear that this stigma has always existed to some degree. I feel as though, despite the progress that has been made over the past 120 years or so, the stigma around abortions still holds true.


In the article, “‘The Conjugal Relationships as regards Personal Health & Hereditary Well-being”, written by Augustus K Gardner in 1894, abortion is talked about as the most unholy of acts.

Gardner writes:

Of all the sins, physical and moral, against man and God, I know of none so utterly to be condemned as the very common one of the destruction of the child while yet in the womb of the mother. So utterly repugnant is it, that I can scarcely express the loathing with which I approach the subject. Murder! Murder in cold blood, without cause, of an unknown child; one’s nearest relative; in fact, part of one’s very being; actually having, not only one’s own blood in its being, but that blood momentarily interchanging! Good God! Does it seem possible that such depravity can exist in a parent’s breast-in a mother’s heart!

(Gardner 1894)

Now, granted that this piece is an opinion piece, and not a genuine case, but nonetheless, this belief was not uncommon amongst the people at the time. Abortion was not declared legal in England until 1967. In the United States, a woman was not allowed to choose until 1973.

Upon finishing the article, which is a complete reiteration of this opening paragraph, it became increasingly clear that the notion of abortion at the time was extreme taboo (which is, again, to be expected). It was viewed as digesting and an act against God.


 

After reading the opinions section of the abortion section on the website, I turned my attention towards actual case studies.

In the city of Lambeth, in 1853, a case was brought up against three doctors, Mr. Charles Cunningham, alias Smith, Mr. James Thompson Currie, and Mr. George Thomas (The Times 1853). In this case, the doctors were brought before a judge with charges indicating that these men were performing illegal abortions in the city, a crime punishable for (according to the article) for up to 15 years in jail.


 

After reading through opinions and the case study, it has become increasingly clear that women had no control over their bodies, and this notion did not change for over 100 years after this case study and opinion piece.

http://www.victorianlondon.org/index-2012.htm

 

 

On “keeping oneself attractive”

On Lee Jackson’s “Victorian Dictionary” site I browsed the subcategory “Health and Beauty” of the “Women” section, where I found a number of articles ranging from topics such as self-care during pregnancy to the “Feminine Diet”. One article which particularly struck me, listed as “keeping oneself attractive”, came from an etiquette and advice manual of the time. It was written by the French Baroness Staffe and translated to English by Lady Colin Campbell in 1893. The article explains the important of the “woman’s sanctum”; that is, her dressing room. According to Baroness Staffe, a lady’s dressing room is a sacred ground for her and her alone, forbidden even to her husband. It’s where a woman “practises all kinds of magic, in order to keep herself so astonishingly young and lovely” as to “captivate, or to retain the heart of, the man she loves” (“The Lady’s Dressing Room”). In other words, it’s where a woman does her make-up and hair every morning, which are of upmost importance for Victorian women. The article shows the ridiculous standards that these women faced (some of which still stand today): Baroness Staffe’s rules dictate that a woman must look beautiful at all times, for it is “her mission to please and charm”. She even says that if a woman should feel insecure or slighted by her husband for looking at another woman, it’s her own fault for not putting more effort into her hair that day or for wearing her corset. Yet men should believe that women are always pretty and sweet-smelling because they are “so adorned by Nature”, not because they are obliged to spend hours on their appearance every morning. The Baroness dismisses women who have a “total disregard of appearances”, citing this as the reason for tumultuous marriages (“The Lady’s Dressing Room”). She expects women to not only abide by her standards but find joy and pleasure in doing so.

Work Cited

Staffe. “The Lady’s Dressing Room”. Trans. Colin Campbell. Cassel & Company Limited, 1893. Web. February 14, 2016.

http://www.victorianlondon.org/publications/ladys-preface.htm#remaining attractive

Thin Women

I read an article about thin women in the Victorian period.  I find it interesting that the topic of the attractiveness of women’s bodies has been going on since such an early period.  I was not surprised that the author of this article was against thin women as being thin did not become popular until the 20th century.  What I did find interesting is the way that the author of the article discusses the reasons for thinness is the way that people in the modern era have talked about the reasons people are overweight.  The article states, “Thinness is often caused by too poor living-that is, by badly-chosen and insufficient food-and by over-fatigue, especially when brought on by prolonged brain-work and excessive anxiety. It is also promoted by a nervous and bilious temperament and a gloomy disposition” (1).  The author discusses poor diet as a reason for thinness which in our time is usually associated with being overweight.  What I also find intriguing is that the demeanor of a thin woman is discussed in this article.  The author states multiple times that thin women are gloomy,  unpleasant, etc.  Physical appearance has nothing to do with personality, yet society has been making claims such even during the Victorian period.  The author also claims that being thin takes away from a women’s femininity.  I knew before that women have always been scrutinized for their appearance, but I didn’t realize how similar the verbiage of the subject would be.  Words like “thin” and “fat” are basically interchangeable in articles like this and if the word “fat” were in this article instead of “thin,” I would have assumed the article was written during the 20th century.  The article goes on to discuss women’s attractiveness in relation to their husband’s happiness.  I find it interesting that in discussing bodies, the idea is always to appear attractive to someone else and not about being healthy.

“Advice and Recipes.”  Victorian London Dictionary.  Web.  14 February 2016.  victorianlondon.org.

Mrs. Bennet and the Potential for Marriage

My name is Ally Cirruzzo, I’m a senior graduating in May, majoring in English with a minor in Creative Writing and Art Studio. My favorite author (and poet) as of late is Sylvia Plath, but JK Rowling will always hold a special place in my heart.

James Fordyce opens one of his sermons to young women with a list of the ways in which a girl can disappoint her parents. The list includes being “unruly, foolish, wanton”, or to “throw herself away on a man unruly of her” (395). He notes that the honor of a family lies heavily on its daughters, less so than its sons. Fordyce goes on to describe a woman’s ability to woo men, adding that there are “few young women who do not appear agreeable in the eyes of some men” (396). He describes women as generally alluring, attractive creatures with as significant hold over men.

Mrs. Bennet, the gossipy mother of Lizzy, the protagonist of Pride and Prejudice, might agree with Fordyce’s notion about women. She is very much concerned with marrying away her five young daughters, in particular to wealthy spouses. She would be the most proud of her daughters if they proved to be worthy potential wives to rich suitors.

Mrs. Bennet quite often makes a fool of herself in trying to incite a marriage between Mr. Bingley, a wealthy bachelor who has recently taken up in the nearby Netherfeld Park manor, and her daughter Jane. Lizzy is very much embarrassed by her mother’s antics.

When Mr. Collins, a clergyman who is slated to inherit the Bennet property, proposes to Lizzy, she turns him down, much to her mother’s dismay. Mr. Bennet, who is as unamused with his wife as Lizzy is, if not more, informs his daughter that “your mother will never see you again if you do not marry Mr. Collins, and I will never see you again if you do” (142). Mrs. Bennet’s sole obsession is marrying her daughters off; she believes it is of upmost importance for her daughters to be appealing to men so that they can find a husband.