I have very mixed feelings about the mad libs assignment because I do think it was fun, but I do think it stirs you away from what the author originally wanted the reader to discover from their work. Yet, it has taught me that substituting the original word out with another word can change the entire meaning of the poem and it can even give you a different perspective of what your initial analysis was, which I think is pretty cool.
The two words that really stuck out to me in the poem was “were” and “so”, they are the only two words to repeat throughout the entire poem and I believe the author intended to use them as a way to brag. The author uses the word “so” in order to emphasis how good the plums were, and he uses the word “were” in order to remind the person that the plums are gone and have been eaten. The poem’s purpose is really to be about a person who is snobby and bragging about the delicious plums someone was saving.
Deformance is helpful to people who struggle with looking deeper into a poem. Breaking down the structure and words allows the reader come up with their own interpretation of the poem. I was able to really catch the author’s dark sarcasm and it made it funny to see how unsympathetic he felt for eating the plums on the person. One thing I would like to do with deformance is to read a poem backwards and see if the meaning is different from what I once thought.