Mad Libs Engine

I enjoyed this activity as an entertaining, laid-back way to end the week. When we first read through some of the entries from the Twitter Bots, I was not really fazed. I saw a few somewhat humorous posts, but nothing that made me think differently about the poems; however, when we were able to generate our own bots, it changed my perception of the Mad Libs Engines. I was able to notice the specific words that were changed more clearly, and realize how important they actually were to the original poem. Two words that stood out to me in particular were “sweet” and “cold.” When I first read the poem, all I saw was an apology letter that was clearly not sincere. Once I generated a poem that replaced the words “sweet” and “cold” with other random adjectives, it seemed to jump out at me more. It is quite clear that Williams was trying to emphasize these adjectives and sort of tease the recipient of his letter. He feels no guilt, he really just wants to let the person know that the plums (or “marques,” “dens,” “kegs,” etc.) were extremely delicious (“pitiful” or “unreasoning”?).

I also decided to try this engine out with the lyrics to the first stanza of “Guns and Ships” from Hamilton. It was pretty entertaining, and I enjoyed that the word following “global” always ended up being something unfortunate such as “disparity” or “deportation.”

I feel like deformance can be useful for certain people, because it does make specific words stand out, and sometimes there are strange coincidences. Mostly, though, I just think it is entertaining and a fun tool to play around with and see how many words you can change in one poem.

Mad Libs Feedback

I have very mixed feelings about the mad libs assignment because I do think it was fun, but I do think it stirs you away from what the author originally wanted the reader to discover from their work. Yet, it has taught me that substituting the original word out with another word can change the entire meaning of the poem and it can even give you a different perspective of what your initial analysis was, which I think is pretty cool.

The two words that really stuck out to me in the poem was “were” and “so”, they are the only two words to repeat throughout the entire poem and I believe the author intended to use them as a way to brag. The author uses the word “so” in order to emphasis how good the plums were, and he uses the word “were” in order to remind the person that the plums are gone and have been eaten. The poem’s purpose is really to be about a person who is snobby and bragging about the delicious plums someone was saving.

Deformance is helpful to people who struggle with looking deeper into a poem. Breaking down the structure and words allows the reader come up with their own interpretation of the poem. I was able to really catch the author’s dark sarcasm and it made it funny to see how unsympathetic he felt for eating the plums on the person. One thing I would like to do with deformance is to read a poem backwards and see if the meaning is different from what I once thought.