The mad lib exercise was a very interesting experiment with words; the major aspect that jumped out at me was the simplicity of what was happening. We do not really ever take into consideration the sensitivity of poetry and how even the slightest change alters pretty much everything. So the word that I think made the biggest difference was the changing of the words “plums.” “This Is Just To Say” goes from this snarky poem about someone eating plums to almost anything else in just a click. By altering the plums the poem immediately changes moods with its infinite potential to become something else. It was certainly jarring to see it go from “I have eaten / the plums” to “I have eaten / the heads.”
I’m sure this would be a fun tool to use on poetry by writers like Edgar Allan Poe. In that, I feel like deformance is a very strange way to look at poems and literature from different angles. Being able to generate what is essentially the same piece under different circumstances can enhance your perspectives on tiny details of the same poem. However, though this may be helpful to plenty of people analyzing certain works, it may totally backfire for others. I feel as though using a method of deformance could be very counterproductive for people who are already scatter brained. This method presents you with infinite alternatives to the original work you read and that could easily overwhelm many types of learners. If you can manage it though, by all means use it, I believe it has potential to be super helpful in understanding literature.